Friday, April 19, 2024

Sounds Like Chicago Bears Are Preparing To Make A Tough Sacrifice

-

GM Ryan Poles has pieced together a strong off-season for the Chicago Bears thus far. D’Andre Swift arrived to bolster their running back room. Keenan Allen was a huge addition at wide receiver, joining D.J. Moore to form probably the best 1-2 punch since Alshon Jeffery and Brandon Marshall. Kevin Byard will step in to replace Eddie Jackson at safety, maintaining stability in the secondary. They also added Ryan Bates and Coleman Shelton to bolster the interior offensive line. Attention has now shifted to the NFL draft, where they hope to address any remaining roster holes.

There is one problem. They may not have enough draft picks to do so. They don’t pick again after their two top-10 selections until the 3rd round. Everybody knows the #1 pick is going to be a quarterback. That means Poles has only one viable pick left to solve any remaining holes on the roster realistically. Unless the team has some sort of crafty maneuver to solve two at the same time, there is a growing likelihood they will have to sacrifice something this season. One position will be left weakened.

Every sign at this point indicates it will be edge rusher. Jeff Hughes of Da Bears Blog alluded to that in his recent discussion on Twitter Spaces. Brad Biggs of the Chicago Tribune and others have also hinted at it. Poles seems focused on upgrading the offense as much as possible to give his young quarterback the best possible chance to succeed, even at the cost of helping the defense.

The Chicago Bears may finally understand their past mistakes.

One of the persistent issues with this franchise has been its inability to properly build a good structure around its young quarterbacks in the past. They were so focused on ensuring the defense stayed strong in case the offense struggled. Almost every past regime was guilty of it. After drafting Cade McNown in 1999, each of the Bears’ next three picks in the 1st and 2nd rounds were defenders. Rex Grossman arrived in 2003. The other 1st round pick that year was defensive end Michael Haynes. The top two picks the next year were both defensive tackles. Ryan Pace opted to take Roquan Smith a year after drafting Mitch Trubisky. For too long, the organization has played it cheap while trying to build around their quarterbacks.

Subscribe to the BFR podcast and ride shotgun with Dave and Ficky as they break down Bears football like nobody else.

This year might be different. Poles seems focused on offense in one way or another at the #9 spot, most likely one of the top wide receivers. There is also the possibility he is looking to upgrade at left tackle. Either decision would significantly improve the chances of whichever quarterback they draft finding success. While this won’t do much to help the defense in 2024, Poles knows he can trust head coach Matt Eberflus to keep that side of the ball respectable until he has a chance to address it more thoroughly in 2025.

Hopefully, by that point, they will have the quarterback situation settled.

27 COMMENTS

Notify of
27 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
TGena
TGena
Mar 25, 2024 9:56 am


When I ask “How’s he doing?” — I’m asking specifically about Ryan Poles (not the Chicago Bears, per se).

There’s no need to wait until the 2024 season begins to evaluate Ryan Poles’ performance, as the Bears’ GM.

barry_mccockiner
Mar 25, 2024 8:33 am

Keep screaming it.

8b2
Byron
Byron
Mar 25, 2024 5:50 am

The offseason so far has been adding to the offense, with the one exception of Byard and a couple of depth pieces. I imagine the first pick will be used on a QB in some way or another. But the second pick will be for a DE in some way or another. I can still remember Poles trading Mack, that was a hard pill to swallow. If you think back to then and compare that scenario to today’s scenario it’s the difference in night and day.

barry_mccockiner
Mar 24, 2024 4:15 pm

I am ONCE AGAIN SAYING: If 1) Caleb is so “generational,” and 2) “generational” play from QB1 elevates everything else on the offensive side, then 3) why is Poles spending all of his resources on offense?

3 does not make any sense if both 1 and 2 are true. So which one of 1 or 2 is wrong?

jmscooby
Mar 24, 2024 4:09 pm

Again, TG, this is a question to be asked at the end of this year, right? You’ve beaten that horse to death. Give a GM 3 years. Pace got twice that, IIRC. Pace also left the next guy dirty to try to save his own neck. So, should Poles get an extra year? Be patient.

I honestly don’t know why you still aren’t carrying on about the horrible job Pace did How could you possibly already be moved on to Poles?
Don’t get me started on Angelo.

Chicago SportsNEWS
Recommended for you

27
0
Give us your thoughts.x
()
x