Saturday, April 11, 2026
✶ Untold Chicago Stories ✶ Amazon Music
Home Blog Page 3043

Derek Holland Makes His Case For SportsCenter Top 10

Derek Holland and the White Sox couldn’t pick up a win this afternoon, as they fell to the Mariners for the third time in as many games. Avi Garcia continued his incredible season by hitting 2 home runs, but the real highlight came from starting pitcher Derek Holland.

Talk about a web gem. The ball actually ended up breaking one of the laces in Holland’s glove when it got stuck, which led to Holland to throw his whole mitt at Abreu. In another losing effort, this play was one of the better ones we have seen this season.

The White Sox have now lost 7 of their last 10, and now have to face the MLB-leading Dodgers, surging Royals, the defending World Series Champion Cubs, and the defending American League Champion Indians all in a row. The upcoming schedule, paired with more trades on the horizon, should make for a lot more losses in the future.

The White Sox were pretty much a lock to have a top 5 pick in next year’s draft. Now it looks like they’ll have a legitimate chance at turning that into a top 3.

Willson Contreras Reveals The Secret To His Red Hot Second Half Start

Through the first three games of the second half of the season, it is very clear who the Cubs best hitter has been.

Reigning MVP Kris Bryant?

No.

Team leader in home runs, Anthony Rizzo?

Nope.

Try 25-year-old catcher, Willson Contreras.

The energetic catcher has started the second half of the season on an absolute TORRID pace. In three wins against the Baltimore Orioles, Contreras went 8-14 with one home run, three 2B, and four RBIs. For the month of July, his number are even more impressive — .378/.425/.703 and a staggering OPS of 1.128.

While I love the numbers that follow Willson, it’s the amount of fun that he has while he’s playing that really makes him such an awesome player.

Contreras has done all of his damage from his new spot in the batting order, clean up, which just so happens to follow another great hitter, Anthony Rizzo. Hitting behind Rizzo has historically paid big dividends as we saw last year with Ben Zobrist. In 2016, Zobrist had an OPS of .831 and an OBP of .386 (which was the second highest of his career.) Now it appears Contreras will be the one reaping all the benefits from hitting after Rizzo and if the first three games are any indication of the second half Contreras will have — look out National League.

While some would think it’s Contreras batting clean up after Rizzo that has helped him get off to a red hot start, there may be something else that helped Willson’s offensive production these first three games.

This is the first documented time that the 2017 Cubs have pulled the old “switch-a-roo” that we all remember so well from last season. If you recall, Anthony Rizzo made headlines during the post season when he admitted that he ditched his bats to use a lighter bat of a teammate, Matt Szczur.

A new spot in the batting order, a teammates bat, and an uncanny eye for the ball has cemented Willson Contreras as one of the most dangerous bats in the Cubs lineup. Getting offensive production from him has to be seen as an additional bonus since this is the first full season that he has been the primary catcher of a very solid pitching staff.

Think about the stress Contreras probably goes through. Jon Lester can’t throw to first base, Jake Arrieta’s command is usually all over the place, John Lackey is just a dickhead, Kyle Hendricks hates to talk, and Jose Quintana is brand new to the team. So the fact that he’s putting up outstanding offensive numbers in addition to being held accountable for managing a big league pitching staff is something that has to be applauded.

And if all of that doesn’t make you love him, when he was being interviewed about his big four-hit day, a reporter asked him what he thought about the Cubs offensive outburst the past three games.

Contreras delivered a short message that all Cubs fans (including myself) have been waiting to hear all season.

“I think we’re back. I think we’re back to who we were last year.”

God I hope so.

Jose Quintana Is Already Setting Cubs Records After Only One Start

It didn’t take newly acquired starting pitcher Jose Quintana long to make his mark for the Chicago Cubs.

The former Chicago White Sox lefty made his debut for the Northsiders today and to say that his first start was outstanding would simply be an understatement. Quintana dominated the Baltimore Orioles today leading the way to a 8-0 victory and a series sweep to open up the second half of the season. His line was absolutely sparkling –7.0 IP, 3 H, 0 ER, 0 BB, and 12 K’s which resulted in leaving a usual potent Oriole offense looking completely clueless all afternoon.

Here’s example A.

The 12 strikeouts are the most strikeouts in a Cubs debut on the road in franchise history and tie for the highest strikeout total in a debut.

How crazy is that while I’m thinking about it? Out of all the Cubs pitchers to make their debut, Quintana now has to share a record with Matt f*cking Garza and his stupid goatee.

When you look at what some of the other members of the Cubs rotation did in their debut, Quintana’s start looks that much better.

Hendricks: 6 IP, 5 H, 4 R, 3 BB, 7 K

Lester: 4.1 IP, 8 H, 3 R, 2 BB, 6 K

Lackey: 6 IP, 8 H, 6 R, 1 BB, 4 K

Obviously, this is only one start for Q but I think it’s safe to say that he’s made a wonderful first impression on Cubs fans everywhere (even the ones who still think he’s just “an average pitcher.”)

 

Chicago Bears and Players Call For Fans To Join “House Halas”

house halas
Credit: Chicago Bears

It’s no secret that Game of Throne is the single-biggest television program going in the world today. When people are super excited for a season trailer, you know it’s a pretty popular program. The twists, the turns, the characters and the edginess of it all makes it so compelling. So it was quite a fun thing when the Chicago Bears Twitter feed proclaimed “We will rise again” before announcing the arrival of “House Halas” to the world.

This is of course a play on the show itself with fans divided between the many factions like House Stark and House Lannister etc. It really did come out of nowhere and was accompanied by a gorgeous picture to bring it all together.

A thing of beauty. Naturally the response by fans was enthusiastic considering the seventh season of Game of Thrones was set to begin that same night. What they probably didn’t plan on was the response of their own players. It started with wide receiver Cameron Meredith who loved the pic so much that he made it his new profile picture.

Starting a House Halas call to arms

Then it was linebacker Danny Trevathan who took things to the next step. Sensing an opportunity, he took Meredith’s idea a step further by adding the hashtag #HouseHalas to it. In that way he was essentially sending a message to his fellow Bears brethren. Are you part of the new movement that will help the team rise again?

The Bears Twitter feed even asked that exact question when they saw what he did.

Suffice to say the response thus far is encouraging. John Timu, William Poehls, Charles Leno Jr., Roy Robertson-Harris, Lamarr Houston and Jordan Howard have all pledged their allegiance to House Halas. As the Game of Thrones premier draws ever closer, one can imagine more will join. This has a chance to be something pretty exciting to ride for both fans and players alike in the coming months.

Jose Quintana In Ideal Position To Help Cubs End This Ugly Streak

jose quintana cubs

The Sunday of June 4th was a nice one for the Chicago Cubs. The weather was good and so was the baseball. It genuinely felt like the team was heading in the right direction. After all they’d just polished off their rival St. Louis Cardinals 7-6, resulting in their third-straight victory and a clean sweep of the series. Sadly the accomplishment went to waste as the team reverted back to its rollercoaster ways. It seems almost too perfect that the much-anticipated Jose Quintana Cubs debut is staring at a similar scenario.

Here the team is again. Another beautiful Sunday and another chance to sweep an important series. The Cubs are coming out of the All-Star break and know they have to stay hot if they want to stay in the playoff picture. They sit 5.5 games back of Milwaukee and need every win they can muster. Getting their first series sweep in 42 days would be a huge boost.

Quintana being the man on the mound to make it happen seems so fitting.

Jose Quintana Cubs debut can alter course of the season

After a difficult start to the season, Quintana has really rounded into form since the beginning of June. In that time he’s pitched six games, gone 5-1 and delivered an earned run average of 2.00. The Cubs can feel secure in this knowledge as well. When the White Sox scored at least four runs in a game this year, they were 9-2 with Quintana on the mound. To date the Cubs are averaging 4.64 runs scored per game.

This game is hugely important for the north siders. They have the Atlanta Braves up next, followed by the Cardinals and then the crosstown series with the White Sox. A sweep over the Orioles could give them the jump start necessary to make a run through that winnable stretch against three struggling teams. All of whom have losing records at the moment.

It’s exactly why Quintana was brought in. To get them that elusive sweep victory that has become such a hard thing to accomplish in 2017. They’ve only done it twice. Before people say that’s not too bad, remember the 2016 Cubs did it eight times by this point last year.

The Bears Already Have the Key Ingredient For Early Trubisky Success

mitch trubisky game plan
Credit: Chicago Tribune

There can be no doubt the Chicago Bears Mitch Trubisky game plan is simple enough. Keep him on the bench until he shows them he’s ready. Given his limited starting experience in college (13 games) that sounds ideal. At the same time it’s almost never that easy. There are any number of ways he could get on the field sooner than anticipated.

Mike Glennon could struggle, which wouldn’t surprise given he was a backup for most of the past three seasons. Or he could get injured. That may sound like a long shot until people look back to last season when both Jay Cutler and Brian Hoyer each suffered season-ending injuries. It can happen.

So that leaves the million dollar question. Are the Bears prepared for that eventuality? Can they ensure a smooth transition for Trubisky to the starting job? Some are skeptical of this, citing serious concerns with the receiving corps and it’s lack of proven options. That’s fair but history shows there are ways around that problem.

Mitch Trubisky game plan centers on running game

What is the key to a young quarterback getting off on the right foot? There is no single answer, but a popular one is giving him a strong running game. This cuts down his exposure both to fierce NFL pass rushes and also allows him to utilize play action, giving him more open throwing lanes for big completions. That builds confidence.

As it turns out this methodology shows a direct correlation throughout Bears history. Look back at all of their first round draft picks. It turns out the most successful ones have the same thing in common. Yep, they all had good running backs at their disposal.

Sid Luckman (1939)

The greatest quarterback in Bears history got lucky from the outset. He had not one but two Pro Bowlers to hand off to. The first was bruising fullback Bill Osmanski and then there lightning fast George McAfee. The latter eventually landed in the Hall of Fame. No small feat given he missed three seasons of his career thanks to World War II.

Johnny Lujack (1946)

He could’ve been remember so much more had he not chosen to retire early. Still, Lujack went to two Pro Bowls during his brief career. Much of that thanks to having McAfee still in the backfield along with underrated fullback Don Kindt. Not the same premier backfield Luckman had, but still effective.

Bob Williams (1951)

Two issues largely ruined Williams’ promising NFL opportunity. The first was the untimely rise of the Korean War, which he served in during 1953. The other was a rather lukewarm backfield led by Fred Morrison and Chuck Hunsinger. Morrison never really fit the Bears scheme and found greater success in Cleveland. Hunsinger was out of the league after three years.

Jim McMahon (1982)

What really needs to be said? Jim McMahon had Walter Payton when he was still in his prime. That makes life easy for any quarterback. In fact he averaged just 28.85 passes per game during his rookie season. That allowed him to go 3-4 his first year and didn’t throw an interception the final three games. Certainly an easy way to build confidence.

Jim Harbaugh (1987)

He didn’t quite have the same success McMahon did in Chicago. Likely because he didn’t quite have the same caliber of back. Even so Neal Anderson was a four-time Pro Bowler. That security blanket allowed Harbaugh to be brought along slowly and as result he went to the playoffs twice in 1990 and 1991.

Cade McNown (1999)

Two words:  Curtis Enis. To this day he’s renowned as one of the biggest Bears draft busts in the Super Bowl era. A top five pick that looked like a future star who accomplished nothing. So it’s safe to say that Cade McNown, who needed a lot of work as a pro passer to begin with, was left to be a sitting duck. He was sack 45 times in 15 starts and never got off the ground.

Rex Grossman (2003)

He didn’t start a lot of games through his first two years, but Grossman had some stability in the backfield whenever he did. As a rookie he had Anthony Thomas, the former 2001 Rookie of the Year who went for over 1,000 yards that season. A year later a man by the name of Thomas Jones arrived. Not a bad succession.

Thus we come back to Mitch Trubisky himself. Who does he have? While not a Sweetness, there is no doubt he got lucky. Jordan Howard is already a Pro Bowl back and considered one of the best runners in the NFL. Not only Mitch but the coaches know that if things aren’t going well for the young QB, they don’t have to worry. Just give the ball to Howard.

It really is that simple when teams have a star at running back. This isn’t an isolated incident either. Look around the league at most of the top quarterbacks. All of the greatest ones almost universally had a great back to lean on when they first started.

  • Matt Ryan had Michael Turner
  • Ben Roethlisberger had Jerome Bettis
  • Eli Manning had Tiki Barber
  • Drew Brees and Philip Rivers had LaDainian Tomlinson
  • Cam Newton had DeAngelo Williams and Jonathan Stewart
  • Russell Wilson had Marshawn Lynch

History shows that young quarterbacks benefit greatly from having dependable running backs to lean on through their first few seasons. The Chicago Bears don’t always take that lesson to heart, but in this case they seem to have nailed it.

Brian Urlacher Reacts To Mitch Trubisky Playoff Comments

brian urlacher

Everybody has heard the Mitch Trubisky playoff comments by now. The rookie was asked a simple question. What were his expectations for the 2017 Chicago Bears? Simple yes, but also loaded. Rather than demure and evade, the young quarterback decided to be honest, saying he felt the team was capable of reaching the postseason.

To be fair he added it wasn’t a guarantee. Just something he believed was possible. Nonetheless it creates a small buzz in the football community. Reactions from fans and media were mixed. Some laughed at the idea, others liked the boldness of the rookie to speak his mind. The superstitious lot felt he risked putting a jinx on the franchise before the season even started.

Either way the debates began, putting the #2 overall pick under the microscope. So what about other Bears alum? Perhaps somebody who knows a thing or two about locker room etiquette and procedure.

Brian Urlacher sounds off on Mitch Trubisky playoff stance

Eight-time Pro Bowl middle linebacker Brian Urlacher remains a hero in Chicago. So anytime he has something to say, it’s taken as gospel. After all the man is the most recent superstar the franchise has had and the team hasn’t been the same since he left. Talking on The Rich Eisen Podcast, he was asked his thoughts on Trubisky.

There was no hesitation in the answer.

Urlacher was never a guy to accept low expectations. Every year he demanded two things from himself and his teammates:  playing hard and wanting to win. If they weren’t gunning for a Super Bowl every year, he didn’t want to play with them. Perhaps that’s why he never got along with Jay Cutler. It was never entirely clear what his motivations were.

Hearing Trubisky set the standard from the beginning is the right sort of message to be sent. Being around other players who want to win is infectious. Urlacher knew that well during the second half of his career. It’s nice to know he wouldn’t have done much to discourage the rookie were he still leader of the locker room.

Three Bears Crack the List of 20 Greatest NFL Defensive Ends

bears khalil mack trade

Do the greatest Bears defensive ends in franchise history have a place on the list of the all-time best in the NFL? With that list expanding every day it’s fair to wonder. Chicago hasn’t seen a dominant pass rusher they could truly call their own for a long time now. Julius Peppers was great but he only lasted four seasons.

People talk about the linebackers in this town but the truth is all their greatest defenses wouldn’t have functioned without at least one top defensive end. According to former scout and executive Gil Brandt, now an analyst for NFL.com, the Bears produced three of the top 20 players at that position in pro football history. Peppers and Jared Allen were also members who snuck into the overall list as well.

So how did the rankings shake out? Fans might be surprised.

Greatest Bears defensive ends hold court in ’85

20. Richard Dent

Chicago Bears, 1983-1993, 1995; San Francisco 49ers, 1994; Indianapolis Colts, 1996; Philadelphia Eagles, 1997
» Two-time Super Bowl champion
» Voted to four Pro Bowls, First Team All-Pro one time
» 1985 NFL sacks leader
» Recorded 137.5 sacks (No. 9 on all-time list)
» Enshrined into the Pro Football Hall of Fame

Dent is the official franchise leader in sacks. His run in the 1985 playoffs was the stuff of legends. He sacked Phil Simms 3.5 times in the divisional round, forced the decisive fumble on Dieter Brock in the NFC championship and won Super Bowl MVP with his 1.5-sack performance. Combined with his postseason career, Dent retired with 148 sacks.

16. Dan Hampton

Chicago Bears, 1979-1990
» One-time Super Bowl champion
» Voted to four Pro Bowls, First Team All-Pro four times
» NFL 1980s All-Decade Team
» Made All-Pro as both defensive end and defensive tackle
» Officially credited with 57 career sacks
» Enshrined into the Pro Football Hall of Fame

So why was Dent outdistanced by his longtime teammate, Hampton? Likely because Danimal proved more valuable to the overall impact of the defense. Sure Dent had more sacks, but he only played one position with one primary job. Hampton made the Pro Bowl at both defensive end and defensive tackle. Officially he has 57 sacks, but if one included his first three years that numbers balloons to 82. Top that off with the fact he was one of their best run defenders and it’s no surprise he placed higher.

Only one man entered the realm of myth though

6. Doug Atkins

Cleveland Browns, 1953-1954; Chicago Bears, 1955-1966; New Orleans Saints1967-1969
» Two-time NFL champion
» Voted to eight Pro Bowls, First Team All-Pro four times
» Played 17 NFL seasons
» NFL 1960s All-Decade Team
» Enshrined into the Pro Football Hall of Fame

People don’t remember Doug Atkins these days for two reasons. He played way back in the 1960s and sacks weren’t an official statistic at the time. So there’s really no way to remember how dominating the 6’8″ monstrosity from Tennessee really was. Only fleeting clips found on the internet offer an idea. If people were to really understand, they’d have to watch the film because Atkins was that good.

One time he estimated grabbing 25 sacks in a single season. Keep in mind this was when teams were playing 12-14 games and quarterbacks were passing an average of 20 times per game. Hampton was one of those ultra rare talents who could’ve played and owned any era in NFL history including today. He still might be the biggest steal among trades the Bears ever had.

Cubs Blow 8-0 Lead, Addison Russell Saves The Day With A Game-Winning HR In The 9th

So, ugh, this wasn’t exactly pretty for the Chicago Cubs, but they’ll take a win any way they can get it after blowing an 8-0 lead to the Baltimore Orioles on Friday night. Addison Russell hit the game-winning home run in the ninth, making it 9-8, and then Wade Davis shut the door in the bottom half.

Russell’s home run was the fifth dinger of the night for the Cubs.

The Cubs jumped all over the Orioles in the first inning, getting four runs after five batters. Willson Contreras hit a three-run home run and then Kyle Schwarber followed up with a homer as well.

Ben Zobrist and Jason Heyward also added home runs, extending the lead to eight after the top of the third inning.

However, Mike Montgomery didn’t have his best stuff, gave up some walks and was getting hit hard once he faced Baltimore’s lineup for the second time. Montgomery was lifted in the fifth inning, but Justin Grimm gave up more hits and at the end Montgomery was charged with four earned runs. During the fifth, Grimm gave up two earned runs of his own, cutting the lead to 8-6.

The Orioles tied the game with a Mark Trumbo two-run homer in the eighth, but thankfully Addison Russell got a hold of one and gave the Cubs the win.

The Biggest Concern With the Bears Offense Not Being Talked About

chicago bears offense

Of course offense in the NFL comes down to two major categories: how many yards gained and how many points scored. Generally the higher those two stats go, the more a team wins. Then again tell that to the New Orleans Saints. They ranked first or second in both and still managed produce just a 7-9 record. So there must be more to it. The Chicago Bears offense can be used as a good example here.

One stat that is undersold these days in terms of importance? Time of possession. For those who aren’t familiar with it, the description is fairly straightforward. It represents the amount of time the offense controls the football during a game. It’s importance is determined by how high or low that time is. Sporting Charts described it as such.

“There is a correlation between teams with a greater time of possession and winning the game, mainly because it’s better to have your offense on the field more than your defense.  The other reason winning teams typically end with a higher time of possession is because they run the clock out towards the later stages of a football game.”

It might sound a bit complex but it’s not. Last season showed just how valuable controlling the football could be to a team and a season.

Chicago Bears offense was second-worst in NFL at T.O.P

Of course there will be doubters of this, but the rankings from last year tell a pretty convincing story. Looking at the top 15 teams in T.O.P rankings, a total of seven wound up in the playoffs. Three others ended up with a record of .500 or better.

  1. Philadelphia Eagles
  2. Dallas Cowboys
  3. Oakland Raiders
  4. Houston Texans
  5. Green Bay Packers
  6. New England Patriots
  7. Tampa Bay Buccaneers
  8. New Orleans Saints
  9. Arizona Cardinals
  10. Carolina Panthers
  11. Indianapolis Colts
  12. Baltimore Ravens
  13. Pittsburgh Steelers
  14. New York Jets 
  15. Kansas City Chiefs

Also included in that list are three of the teams that played in the conference championship game. The only one that wasn’t were the Atlanta Falcons. That was due to them being the highest-scoring offense in the league with 93 big plays. They were too busy scoring to worry about clock management. Not every team has that luxury, including the Bears.

Where did they rank? A dismal 31st out of 32 teams. Chicago controlled the football for just 46.77% of their games. That averages out to approximately 28 minutes per game. The correlation shows in their record too. In their three victories of 2016 they possessed the ball for an average of 32 minutes and 24 seconds. That stat drops considerably in their 13 defeats. So how were they able to control it whenever they did?

Running the ball and no turnovers helped

Two other big things stuck out in those three victories. The first is that Chicago ran the ball well. They posted games of 114, 158, and 142 yards on the ground respectively. The other was limiting giveaways. Collectively the Bears had just one turnover across those three contests. It shouldn’t be a shock. Running the ball slows the game down. Not turning it over prevents the opposing offense from getting extra opportunities.

Chicago ranked 17th in rushing and 3rd in giveaways last season. That is a recipe for poor time of possession and limited wins. If this team wants to flip the script in 2017, they’re going to have to make corrections on all of those fronts. Otherwise it will just be more of the same from last year.