Saturday, November 14, 2026
EDGE is live. Chicago fans can now access and explore the beta.
Home Blog Page 3071

Mel Kiper Shifts The Chicago Bears Focus in Latest Mock Draft

mel kiper

Well, it seems Mel Kiper Jr. has had a change of heart recently. In his first mock draft of the 2018 off-season, the longtime ESPN staple took the easy road for the Chicago Bears. He had them selecting wide receiver Calvin Ridley of Alabama with their 8th overall pick. This was the obvious choice. The Bears have issues at wide receiver. Ridley is the best one in the class. Basically putting two and two together. The problem is Kiper didn’t grasp the situation.

For starters, Ridley has a number of question marks that leave him in doubt for the top 10. He’s thinner than ideal for an NFL receiver. To top it off he turns 24-years old this December. Will a team actually invest a pick that high in a player who might have a shorter career? Unlikely. Never mind the Kevin White disaster back in 2015, something that might for GM Ryan Pace to shy away from another first round receiver.

It seems Kiper learned his lesson. His second mock draft is out and the Bears went in an entirely different direction this time.

Mel Kiper has Bears grabbing freak linebacker for their defense

It’s no secret the Bears need help on offense. One would think that’s where they’ll focus early in the draft. At the same time, the defense is the strength of this team right now. Keeping it strong should be a priority. That means adding elite talent whenever the opportunity comes. Kiper thinks they’ll take this approach with his latest projection.

“Tremaine Edmunds, LB, Virginia Tech

Edmunds is a tremendous athlete. He could play inside or outside linebacker in the Bears’ 3-4, and it’s that versatility and athleticism that has scouts drooling. I expect him to put up huge numbers at the combine. Edmunds had 109 total tackles, 14 tackles for loss and 5.5 sacks in 2017, and he does a good job covering pass-catchers out of the backfield. At 6-5 and 250 pounds, Edmunds doesn’t look like a traditional middle linebacker, but he’s such a physical specimen that you can’t rule it out. And the Bears just released Jerrell Freeman. Chicago could also be in the market for an offensive tackle or wide receiver here.”

Edmunds is a fascinating prospect. Truly one of the freak athletes in the class. Built like a defensive end but can run like a safety. He’s got the size to take on blockers but the speed to chase down ball carriers. Lance Zierlein of NFL.com compared him to Brian Urlacher. The scary thing is that’s not hard to see. The two share several traits in common. Of course, there’s no way to know if Edmunds has the same mental acuity as the first ballot Hall of Famer.

Either way, the young man has immense promise. The tricky part will be finding his best position in the pros. Is it at inside linebacker or outside linebacker? That will be up to Vic Fangio to decide.

Bears Draft Plans Inching Closer To Possible Trade Move

bears draft plans

The Chicago Bears draft plans for 2018 are still in the preliminary stages. GM Ryan Pace still has a ton of work to do. The scouting combine is right around the corner, following by pro days. The draft board is far from set in terms of who the Bears may or may not want to draft. That being said, it’s likely Pace already has a strong idea of where the strengths of this incoming class are.

If that’s the case he also has an idea of what he’ll want to do when the action begins. Particularly in regards to a possible trade. It’s becoming apparent over the past two years that Pace is not a man who likely to remain idle. After staying put in his first year back in 2015, he has traded up in both the 2016 and 2017 drafts.

Will he possibly make it a third-straight time in 2018 or could a different sort of move be in mind? Several ideas are in play but one source informed me that the strongest among them, at least for the moment, involves considerable gamble fans haven’t seen in years.

Bears draft plans could involve a steep 1st round drop

The source told me the phones remain hot in discussions with several teams. Pace is exploring any and all moves he could make come this April. There is one, though, that has gained some steam.

“They’ve been engaged in talks with teams in front and back of them in the draft. The one that’s gaining momentum is with Buffalo. Multiple scenarios were discussed including both 1sts (#21 and #22) for #8.”

This is an interesting scenario. The Buffalo Bills are quite stacked with draft picks this year. They hold two first and two second round picks. So they are equipped to make a big jump up the board without having to sacrifice future selections if they wish. It’s also no secret they’re in the hunt for a quarterback. They signaled that last year when they benched Tyrod Taylor. However, their first attempt failed when Nathan Peterman threw five interceptions in his first game.

With so many other teams likely to outmaneuver them for the top free agents, Buffalo’s best chance to land a top QB is the draft. Chicago holds a strong position in this regard with their 8th pick. There is definitely a scenario in play that could see this trade happen. If a number of the top free agents like Kirk Cousins, Case Keenum or Teddy Bridgewater land with QB-needy teams picking above them (Browns, Giants, Broncos, Jets), this could cause one or two top prospects to fall.

In the event that happens, Buffalo will be ready to pounce. Chicago would gain lots of flexibility with an extra first round pick. Were it to happen, it would mark the first time since 2003 the Bears have made such a move. Here’s hoping Pace does better than Michael Haynes and Rex Grossman if it happens.

Red Sox Owner Takes A Shot At Cubs Hitting Coach Chili Davis

After three straight trips to the NLCS that included winning the 2016 World Series, Joe Maddon revamped his coaching staff following the 2017. Chili Davis is one of the new Cubs coaches and earlier this week Boston Red Sox owner John Henry took a shot at the hitting coach.

Boston failed to meet expectations in 2017, losing to the Houston Astros in the ALDS. The Red Sox fired manager John Farrell and Davis was quickly scooped up by the Cubs after being in Boston for three seasons. Fast forward to Monday, when the Red Sox’s owner had what’s being described as a testy session with the media, that included a not so subtle jab at Davis and his job as the team’s hitting coach.

Henry wasn’t shy about calling out the team’s offense, but pointed the finger at the coaches.

Via MassLive.com.

“We’ve made a lot of changes other than just the manager. You haven’t noticed?” Henry said when asked about the lack of turnover on the roster. “I’m just saying from my perspective at least, we’ve made a lot of changes. I think our approach last year was lacking offensively and we had issues that the players have already talked about.”

Henry mentioned the Red Sox’s offensive approach several times throughout a 17-minute session with the media on Monday.

“I think we would’ve had significant power last year if we had a different approach,” he said.

“I didn’t think we were nearly aggressive enough and I think our approach was lacking for a good part of the season,” he added.

So, the owner believes the offensive approach wasn’t good enough, seemingly blaming Davis for the team’s lack of power and hitters not being aggressive.

This is a good time to remind you that Chili Davis was the hitting coach for the Red Sox in 2016 as well and that season the team led the American League in doubles, average and OPS. They also ranked eighth in the AL with 208 home runs.

In 2017, the Red Sox finished dead last in the AL with 168 homers, 11th in OPS and scored 785 runs, compared to 878 runs scored in 2016. Kind of alarming, so should Cubs fans be worried? Ugh….no.

See, what Henry failed to mention while criticizing the loss of power from the Red Sox is that their home run leader in 2016, David Ortiz, retired! Oh, sp the team had fewer dingers in 2017 after Ortiz, who hit 38 the year before, was all of a sudden no longer on the team? Shocker.

But that’s not even the point. The so called approach that was lacking, did Chili Davis suddenly see the success the Red Sox had in 2016 and then completely change it? Did he tell the Red Sox to hit fewer home runs? More than any position in sports being a hitting coach sucks because rarely do they get any credit and once the team starts to struggle the hitting coach is first to blame.

By the way, in 2016 the Red Sox had 558 walks and in 2017 that went up to 571. The approach seems just fine and the problem might have to do more with the players who were no longer on the team and injuries from Red Sox players in 2017 that led to crappier numbers.

So, get the hell out of here with this Chili Davis slander, John Henry.

Chicago Bears Send Clear Message With Their First Big Cuts of 2018

chicago bears 2018 off-season

The Chicago Bears 2018 off-season is a-go. That was made clear with their first two notable moves, both coming within hours of each other. It started when inside linebacker Jerrell Freeman was reportedly cut by the team. This wasn’t much of a surprise. His 2017 run was brief and controversial. He tore his pec in the first game of the season, landed on injured reserve and then got suspended for his second PED violation.

With younger options like Christian Jones and Nick Kwiatkoski playing well, his fate was sealed. Not long after it was reported that former Pro Bowl guard Josh Sitton would not have his $8 million option picked up by the Bears for this season. This essentially made him a free agent. In two years with the team, he did make the Pro Bowl but also dealt with nagging injury problems.

While it’s not shocking that those two men were cut, the fact they were first to go sends a fairly strong message from the Bears brass. One that could hold true for the next month as they shift the roster under their new coaching staff.

Chicago Bears 2018 off-season is clear:  out with the old

Injuries and money certainly played a part in the Bears’ decision to cut Freeman and Sitton. However, the overlying reason was far simpler than that. Both men are old. Freeman turns 32 in May of this year. The same goes for Sitton in June. GM Ryan Pace has an established reputation for unloading older players he believes are trending down in their careers. Those two weren’t the first.

They also won’t be the last. Looking at the list of other names on the roster, there are several who definitely fit the same category.

  • Pernell McPhee (30 in December)
  • Willie Young (33 in September)
  • Quintin Demps (33 in June)

That’s not even counting other obvious cuts like Mike Glennon and Markus Wheaton. The Bears currently sit at $51 million in projected salary cap space. If those five additional names come off the books, that number would spike to $82 million. Suffice to say the Bears would be swimming in cash by that point. Whether Pace would know what to do with it remains a fair question given his free agency shortcomings of late.

The youth movement will continue though. Head coach Matt Nagy clearly wants an athletic roster with plenty of endurance to run his up-tempo system. Older players can often struggle with that.

Willson Contreras Gives Zero F*cks About New MLB Rules

Chicago Cubs catcher Willson Contreras is not a fan of the new MLB rules and he made it known publicly on Tuesday.

Major League Baseball announced new rules that will be implemented in the 2018 season, hoping the policies can help the pace of play problem in the sport. Although there won’t be a pitch clock, MLB commissioner Rob Manfred unveiled the set of rules that includes limiting mound visits.

Here’s the new rule on mound visits. Via MLB.com.

• Mound visits: Mound visits will be limited to six per team per nine innings. Teams will receive an additional visit for every extra inning played. Any manager, coach or player visit to the mound will count as a mound visit. Visits to the mound to clean cleats in rainy weather, to check on an injury or potential injury or after the announcement of an offensive substitution are excepted. Also, normal communication between player and pitcher that do not require either to vacate their position on the field do not count as a visit. If a team is out of visits, the umpire will have discretion to grant a visit at the catcher’s request if he believes there has been a cross-up between the pitcher and catcher.

So, teams are limited to six mound visits per nine innings, but even at the end of the rule it gives umpires the power to grant another visit if the catcher requests one. Well, it doesn’t seem like Contreras cares if he’s going to be granted permission or not.

Contreras does not give a single fuck about what happens if he breaks that rule and gave reporters this awesome quote.

You have to love the passion and competitive nature from Contreras, but the thing is the penalty could end up hurting the Cubs more than not going out there for another mound visit.

Contreras had a breakout 2017 season, and despite missing time because of a leg injury the catcher still had a 3.2 fWAR, hitting 21 home runs with a slash line of .276/.356/.499. An important piece in the Cubs lineup and a unique set of skills defensively behind the plate. The thing is, Contreras can be a rebel all he wants, but no one’s going to want that if it leads to an ejection, which breaking the mound visit rule could apparently happen.

Here’s the complete breakdown of the rule, including a more detailed explanation of the umpire’s discretion.

I) Mound Visits 
1. Number
A. 2018 Championship Season. Mound visits without a pitching change shall be limited to six (6) per team, per nine innings. For any extra-innings played, each Club shall be entitled to one additional non-pitching change mound visit per inning.
B. OBR 5.10(l). Official Baseball Rule 5.10(l), which governs mound visits by a manager or coach, remains in effect (i.e., a pitcher must be removed on the second visit by a manager/coach in an inning).

2. Definition of Mound Visit. A manager or coach trip to the mound to meet with the pitcher shall constitute a visit. A player leaving his position to confer with the pitcher, including a pitcher leaving the mound to confer with another player, shall also constitute a mound visit, regardless of where the visit occurs or the length of the visit, except that the following shall not constitute mound visits:
A. Discussions between pitchers and position player(s) that (i) occur between batters in the normal course of play and do not require either the position player(s) or the pitcher to relocate;
B. Visits by position players to the mound to clean spikes in rainy conditions;
C. Visits to the mound due to an injury or potential injury of the pitcher; and
D. Visits to the mound after the announcement of an offensive substitution.

3. Cross-Up in Signs. In the event a team has exhausted its allotment of mound visits in a game (or extra inning) and the home plate umpire determines that the catcher and pitcher did not have a shared understanding of the location or type of pitch that had been signaled by the catcher (otherwise referred to as a “cross-up”), the home plate umpire may, upon request of the catcher, allow the catcher to make a brief mound visit. Any mound visit resulting from a cross-up prior to a team exhausting its allotted number of visits shall count against a team’s total number of allotted mound visits.

Contreras hasn’t been the only Cubs player to speak out against the new rules. Jon Lester had the following to say regarding the issue.

Via the Chicago Sun-Times.

“I get the mound-visit thing,” said Lester, whose catcher, Willson Contreras, might make more trips to the mound than any other catcher in the league. “But also, what people [who] aren’t in the game don’t understand is there’s so much technology now, there’s so many cameras on the field, that every stadium now has a camera on the catcher’s crotch. So they know the signs before you even get there.

“Now we’ve got Apple watches. Now we’ve got people being accused of sitting in a tunnel [trying to steal signs]. There’s reasons behind the mound visit. He’s not just coming out there asking what time I’m going to dinner or ‘How you feeling?’ There’s reasons behind everything, and I think if you take that away, it takes away from the beauty of the baseball game.”

New Cubs catcher Chris Gimenez hit on the head with his comments. Yes, there’s a lot of dead time during games, but the mound visit rule really isn’t going to fix that problem.

Veteran backup catcher Chris Gimenez isn’t a big fan of restricted mound visits, either.

“[But] six is at least doable,” he said. “If it was two or three, that’s an issue. . . . I just think the mound visits aren’t what’s slowing the game down. There’s some fundamental things that you need to leave alone, and I think that’s one of those things.”

The other rules involve commercial times for local and national televised games.

The timer will count down from 2:05 for breaks in locally televised championship season games, from 2:25 for breaks in nationally televised championship season games, and from 2:55 for tie-breaker and postseason games.

MLB opted not to have a pitch clock, giving the pitcher a certain amount of time to deliver the ball, as well as a between-batter clock.

Before the new rules were official, Lester said fans know what they’re getting when they go to a baseball game.

While Lester’s right about that, the problem is MLB has to think about the big picture and that’s to continue growing the game to a wider audience. If more fans single out the pace of play in the game being an issue the league has a responsibility to address it.

It all goes back to the money. TV contracts are where these teams and the league make bank, so you bet they’re going to try to do everything they can to get as many eyeballs on their product and pace of play is step one. Players can hate it all they want, but at the end they’ll be happy down the road when the revenue keeps going up and they get their piece of the pie.

Kobe Bryant Reveals He Almost Went To The Bulls Three Years Earlier Than You Thought

Since Michael Jordan retired from basketball for the third and final time in 2003, NBA experts, analysts, and fans alike have been tirelessly searching for the “next” MJ. Often times conjuring up ridiculous similarities and/or differences between (insert player here) and His Airness, negative or positive, to validate their claim as to whether Jordan still is, or isn’t, the best to ever grace the hardwood. However, as much of a fool’s errand as these comparisons are, no other player’s similarities are as well documented as that of Kobe Bryant.

Since Bryant’s career began he never shirked from the constant questions as to whether or not he had made it his career mission to chase the ghost of Jordan, and surpass his idol as the best to ever do it.

To give credit where credit is due– Bryant made a very valiant effort– winning five titles during a career that spanned 20 years for the Los Angeles Lakers.

During a “Players Only” segment for TNT for NBA All-Star weekend, Bryant, never one to back down from a challenge, told former teammate Shaquille O’Neal how close he actually came to leaving the Lakers and cementing his legacy in the house Jordan built.

Kobe Bryant Reveals He Almost Went To The Bulls In 2004

After the Lakers lost in embarrassing fashion to the Detroit Pistons in the 2004 NBA Finals, it seemed the rumors of an eroding relationship between the dynamic Shaq-Kobe duo had finally come to a head– and for Kobe, if he was to actually leave– it seemed the only place that truly made sense, considering his career ambitions, was Chicago.

“When I retire, I don’t want people to see, he only won because of Shaq. As unfair as that is, Magic never won without Cap (Kareem Abdul-Jabbar). Michael (Jordan) never won without Scottie (Pippen). But here I am getting stuck with this argument, which is not fair, but yet this is the argument people will make. And I’m not OK with that.”

All the experts predicted that Kobe Bryant, then a free agent, would stay in Los Angeles, but become a member of the Clippers. However, contrary to popular belief, while the talking heads focused on a stay in LA, Bryant revealed he and his wife Vanessa were actually looking for homes and researching schools in the Chicago area. O’Neal had heard the rumors but didn’t believe it at the time.

“Oh yeah, we were looking for places in Chicago, man,” Bryant said. “We were flying up there to meet with (Jerry) Reinsdorf and (John) Paxton.”

O’Neal reacted by saying, “You would leave sunny California to go to cold ass Chicago?”

“Vanessa signed off,” Bryant said. “We were moving out to Lake Forest, I think it was. Chicago. And went on vacation in Italy, I got a phone call. (Then-agent) Rob Pelinka called and he said, ‘Shaq just requested a trade.’ I was like, ‘Well there goes Chicago.’ There’s no way the Lakers are going to lose me and Shaq in the same year.“

But just imagine what could have been, Bryant coming to Chicago, carrying the torch left by Michael, adorning 24, one over Jordan. It’s stories like this that make sports fun– always imagining, what could have been.

Kyle Schwarber’s Introduction To Chili Davis Is Absolutely Hilarious

When the Cubs hired Chili Davis as their new hitting coach this off-season, very few people understood how big of a signing that was. The 19-year MLB veteran knew a thing or two about hitting which was reflected by his .274/.360/.451 career slash line and also the fact that he has had great coaching success with the Oakland A’s and the Boston Red Sox. Davis has already brought a new vibe to the team in the first week of Spring Training and has jumped right into getting to work with the Cubs hitters who have all noticed one thing about their new hitting coach:

He likes to talk.

All of that talking has drawn the attention of one of the Cubs’ biggest question marks in 2018, Kyle Schwarber. Coming off a huge let down in 2017 which saw the slugger get demoted to AAA, Schwarber and Davis have seemed to formed a strong relationship early on in camp.

Before the two met, Schwarber already made it his mission to right the wrong of 2017 which began with a full body transformation to drop weight and improve his quickness. Cubs fans are hoping that both his body AND his hitting approach will show up on Opening Day looking very different.

And if it’s anyone that can help change that approach, it’s Chili Davis.

Davis shared a story with NBC Chicago’s Kelly Crull about the first thing that Kyle Schwarber told him when the two met during a pre-season meeting.

“”Schwarbs, he knows he’s a good player. His first statement to me is, ‘I don’t suck.'”

Schwarber’s stats last season would beg to differ with that quote but it also shows his desire to get back to the player that he was when he burst on the scene in 2015. Davis shared some interesting perspective as to why he thought Schwarber statistically had the worst season of his career last year. Davis believed it may have been a lack of focus.

“I think it may have been, he had a big World Series, hit some homers, and I think he tried to focus on being more of a home run type guy as opposed to being a good hitter.”

Davis has been impressed with Schwarber’s work ethic thus far and has also shared his own story with the Cubs slugger to show him that everyone has obstacles to overcome. Davis himself was sent to AAA during a similar point in his career and obviously was able to overcome that to have an impressive MLB career.

Although Schwarber is in only his second full season in the MLB, his potential is still through the roof and Chili Davis may be the guy to get Schwarber’s MLB career back on track.

Emerging Trade Option Could Solve Bears’ Biggest Roster Issue

chicago bears

The Chicago Bears have a true headache on their hands. His name is Kyle Fuller. The 25-year old cornerback had a career year in 2017. He finished with two interceptions and 22 passes defended. He also finished among the top defenders in tackles. His value to the secondary was unquestioned all season long. Now he’s set to become a free agent along with three other key corners on the roster.

The Bears are in a serious pickle. They have plenty of salary cap space. They could re-sign every player including Fuller. The franchise tag is in play as well should he play hardball on a new long-term extension. At the same time, the threat of him leaving is there. People haven’t forgotten what happened with Alshon Jeffery.

Nonetheless, GM Ryan Pace is facing a challenge. Can he keep the cornerback group together? Or better yet. Is there any way he could actually improve on it. There might be a possible way developing elsewhere. One that may change the face of the Bears defense if they’re willing to pay the price.

Chicago Bears could get in on Marcus Peters trade buzz

According to Jason La Canfora of CBS Sports, there is an undercurrent of smoke coming out of Kansas City. One that hints Pro Bowl cornerback Marcus Peters may be going on the trade block. This might sound unfathomable, but it’s the NFL. Crazy things tend to happen.

Now it’s well-known La Canfora can be unreliable with such predictions. His hit-miss record is average at best. Still, it’s an interesting situation. Peters is 25-years old and entering the final year of his rookie contract. It’s obvious to anybody he’s going to command big money. Given his reputation for being outspoken and controversial, the Chiefs may not be keen on paying that price tag.

There’s also the situation regarding their recent moves. Thanks to the Alex Smith trade they acquired young corner Kendall Fuller, considered an emerging stud in the slot. They also signed decent free agent David Amerson. Two moves at the cornerback position. Is it meant to fortify their already strong secondary or perhaps a preliminary step to moving Peters?

Pairing Peters with Fuller could be a game-changer

Regardless of the reasoning, the fact is the Bears should have serious interest in this idea. Peters has 19 interceptions over the past three seasons. He’s the best ball-hawking cornerback in football and a perfect fit for the Vic Fangio defense. Imagine what the Bears could do if they were able to pair him with Fuller in the secondary. A long-time team weakness would suddenly become a strength.

It comes down to what they’d have to pay. Conventional wisdom says somewhere around a high second or late first round pick.

Is this a price worth paying for the Bears? Well here’s some context. Since the 1970 merger, Chicago has selected 45 players in the second round. Only seven of them went on to make a Pro Bowl. Peters has already been to two of them and won’t turn 26 until next January. Absolutely this is a move they should consider.

John Fox Clearly Sour While Admitting Bears Ready to Turn Corner

john fox

Former Chicago Bears head coach John Fox no doubt feels some regret. His run with the team counts as his first-ever true failure as the job in his long NFL career. He took Carolina and Denver to Super Bowls. He couldn’t even manage a winning season in Chicago. For someone so competitive like him, that has to sting beyond measure.

Fox finished 14-34 in his Bears run. That amounts to the second-worst winning percentage in franchise history. It’s hard to say where things went wrong. The team was in a clear rebuild when he took over, something he had never experienced before. The Panthers and Broncos each already had strong, young cores in place when he took over those franchises. Such wasn’t the case in Chicago.

Then there were the injury problems. No team in the NFL could match the Bears for the number of players landing on injured reserve, especially over the past two years. It’s hard to win games when so many starters aren’t on the field. In the end, though, Fox’s outdated coaching style put the final nail in his coffin. His inability to coach up the quarterback position was a major factor in his dismissal.

Now he’s forced to endure one of the harshest realities of a fired coach:  watching somebody else reap the rewards of his hard work.

John Fox can’t hide his regret while saying Bears are almost ready to win

NBC Sports Chicago caught up with the 62-year old this off-season. Fox has no plans to retire yet and is likely awaiting his next opportunity. He took the chance to talk about his time with the Bears. It seemed hard for him to not seem a little sour about not being able to finish the job.

“It would’ve been nice to see it through. That’s kind of a bitter pill but you sort things out and move forward.

“I do think it’s closer than people think. We inherited a mess… but I felt we were on the brink at the end. I think that [Halas Hall] building is definitely different; they feel it. I do think that it was a positive.”

He’s not wrong. It did feel like the Bears were starting to trend upwards at the end of the 2017 season. They blew out the Cincinnati Bengals and Cleveland Browns in December. Mitch Trubisky was playing some good football and the defense, despite injuries, allowed 15 points or less in three of the last five games.

One more good off-season from GM Ryan Pace could set them up to make a playoff push in 2018. Undoubtedly Fox recognized that. To think that Matt Nagy might swoop in and enjoy the spoils of that tireless work? It has to sting a little.

A Bold Option on Kyle Fuller The Bears Might Be Considering

kyle fuller

The Chicago Bears have maintained complete silence on their plans for cornerback Kyle Fuller. They hinted their desire for him to stay. That much is obvious after he’s coming off a career-best two interceptions and 22 passes defended in 2017. At 25-years old he’s entering his prime. The market is undoubtedly going to be strong for him, as it typically is for cornerbacks.

Undoubtedly GM Ryan Pace would love to avoid another Alshon Jeffery situation. That being a talented young player leaving in free agency and exposing a weakness on the Bears roster. This is why the general consensus believe Fuller will get the franchise tag. It keeps him in place for another year, pays him top money and buys the Bears time to find common ground on a long-term extension.

However, that’s not the only route open to them. There is a third, less utilized one that is possible. It would involve losing Fuller but would help to facilitate a trade that could get the Bears something in return.

Bears could use transition tag to secure Kyle Fuller compensation

It must be noted this scenario is built around the idea that Fuller is much like Jeffery was. He has little desire to return to Chicago. If that’s the case, the Bears have to find a way to get something back for him. The good news is Fuller’s value is much higher than Jeffery’s was a year ago. So the transition tag is in play.

The basic idea of the transition tag is simple. It allows an NFL to prevent a player from leaving outright. Other teams are allowed to negotiate with that player and make an offer. If he accepts, the Bears would have the right to match that offer. On the other hand, if Fuller were to agree to the deal the other team could negotiate a trade to ensure the Bears don’t match the offer, thus allowing him to leave.

This is basically how Rich Tandler of NBC Sports broke it down on the Kirk Cousins situation in Washington.

“There doesn’t really need to be any winking and nodding involved; the Redskins can give Cousins’ agent permission to talk to any or all teams at any time. Here is my understanding of how it could work out after the Redskins put the tag on him. 1) Cousins works out a deal with, say, Denver. No offer sheet is signed. 2) Cousins goes back to the Redskins, signs the tag, and the teams execute a trade that was agreed to beforehand. 3) Cousins signs the new deal with the Broncos.”

The benefits of this move would be three-fold

It’s a move that would require a lot of trust but also be a win-win situation. A trade would assure Fuller that he doesn’t have to stay in Chicago and is allowed to pick his own team. That team would be able to avoid a front-loaded contract that can hurt their free agency prospects. The Bears get something back in return. Likely a solid draft choice.

It’s not hard to imagine them getting a second round pick in any deal. Fuller has proven his value to that extent at least. It comes down to the unknown factor. Does he want to stay or does he want to leave? Only Fuller himself can answer that question and he won’t reveal it to anybody until he’s ready.