Thursday, November 12, 2026
EDGE is live. Chicago fans can now access and explore the beta.
Home Blog Page 3269

Jarrett Payton Touching Cubs Tribute To Father Brings Too Many Tears

jarrett payton chicago cubs

Even today, 18 years after his tragic passing from liver disease, Walter Payton remains ingrained in the minds of Chicago sports fans. A larger than life icon who carried the torch through one of the darkest decades in the city’s history. He did it without complaint and through sheer determination and effort. That’s what makes this Jarrett Payton Chicago Cubs tribute all the more touching, and heart wrenching at the same time.

One of the most gleeful memories of Jarrett’s life came in 1986 when he got to throw out the first pitch at a Cubs game. His father was the toast of town at the time, fresh off leading the Bears to a Super Bowl championship. It was a good time to be a Payton. Over the years as he grew up, Jarrett reflected on what times like that meant to him.

Which made him appreciate it all the more when his own son got to do the same at Wrigley. Ironically right after the Cubs won the World Series.

It really is amazing how circular life can be sometimes. No doubt Jarrett wishes his father could be there to see his grandson take the mound. Then again the spirit of Sweetness has never really left Chicago. Ever since his retirement and eventual death, the city has set their standards quite high for what their athletes should embody.

However, for Jarrett the big lesson is not about becoming a great player on the field. It’s about becoming a good man and father at home.

Joe Maddon Says Jake Arrieta’s Early Struggles Are On Purpose

The Cubs Jake Arrieta has been noticeably slower to start 2017. And when I say slow, I don’t mean Arrieta has struggled this season – he’s been classic Jake through three starts – but I mean it literally. He’s been throwing a lot slower to start 2017, compared to what we are used to seeing from the whiskered-righty, close to four or five miles per hour slower actually.

His first start of the season, Cubs twitter was quick to point out that Arrieta’s fastball looked less-than-average, coming in at about 90-91 mph. However, his stuff was still solid and he would go on to pitch six innings of four hit baseball, allowing only one single run. While he had calmed the nerves of the Cub faithful, Arrieta had the full attention of the baseball-statistical savvy as they saw one of the game’s most explosive pitchers struggling to throw harder than his 38-year-old teammate John Lackey.

The news of Arrieta and his low velocity exploded after Fangraphs writer Jeff Sullivan wrote this story titled, ” What on Earth Happened With Jake Arrieta?” The story dives into Arrieta’s velocity and while losing speed on your fastball is never good, it’s not the end of the world either. Arrieta was asked about his lack of high velocity after his win against the Brewers on April 9th, and he even referenced the article to CSN Chicago’s Patrick Mooney in a quote.

“Everybody wants to talk about this,” Arrieta said after Sunday’s 7-4 win over the Milwaukee Brewers at Miller Park. “There’s FanGraph articles. I don’t care about that.

“I know that kind of stuff can come and go from time to time. I had periods last year where I was at the same spot I am right now. I had one in June, near the All-Star break. It is what it is. I still have good feel for everything. Movement is really good. The command’s good.

“When the 95-to-97 comes back, it’s going to be tough for teams. And it still is.”

Arrieta seems content with where he is at right now, however, his declining velocity combined with his lack of control throughout 2016 is reason enough for some early concerns. Personally, I brushed off the comments and concerns initially, knowing that the league was making the switch from their old velocity tracking system, PITCH F/X to using the MLB’s very own Statcast system. But once I discovered that most pitchers velocities were being increase by the new system, ala Carlos Martinez and his constant 100 mph fastballs, I started to grow more wary of the the former NL Cy Young award winner.

But just yesterday, Cubs skipper Joe Maddon shed some light on the situation, as he explained why exactly Arrieta’s fastball looked so lackluster to start 2017.

Another Former NFL Scout Hears Bears Draft This QB With 3rd Pick

At this point either GM Ryan Pace doesn’t care if other teams know his intentions for the #3 pick or he’s executed one of the best misdirection campaigns in recent memory. As written a number of times over the past week on SM, the growing sentiment regarding that pick is the Bears draft QB all the way. Despite much insisting that the class is too raw and not worth a top five pick, the bottom line is Pace may not have a choice.

Word persists that four quarterbacks are expected to go in the first round this year. So if the Bears passed on one at #3, they’d be getting the fifth-best QB in a class that’s considered thin. Not ideal. Thus the decision is fairly simple. If the plan is to get a long-term talent they can develop into a starter, then they must take him right away. Odds are never good they’ll get a guy worth much by waiting even one round.

All signs continue to insist Mike Glennon is a veteran holdover who will keep the seat warm. He is by no means their guy. Not unless he impresses this season, which is hard to see happening.

Bears draft QB buzz not going away

Former Dallas Cowboys scout Bryan Broaddus, now a writer for Dallascowboys.com, is hearing the noise as well. He believes the Bears do indeed have their eyes on a QB.

“There’s a lot of rumors going around. There’s a lot of whispering going on right now about the Chicago Bears taking (quarterback) Mitch Trubisky at three. I think that’s serious. But there’s some of them, you know, with Cleveland not knowing whether they’re going to take a quarterback or a defensive end. I think the Browns know exactly who they’re gonna take at one.”

Several local Chicago insiders are hearing similar buzz, though most are connected to Deshaun Watson rather than Trubisky. That being said Trubisky has steadily been hinted as a favorite of theirs for the past few months. Knowing this it would appear that the Bears have narrowed the choice down to either him or Watson. Not a surprise since most experts consider those two as the best in this draft.

The appeal of each is easy enough to see. Trubisky is probably the better scheme fit for offensive coordinator Dowell Loggains. He has quick feet, good feel in the pocket, throws accurate passes and has keen understanding rhythm and timing throws. Common belief is he’s the most pro-ready of the top QBs. Amazing since he’s only started 13 games.

Watson on the other hand falls more in line with what Pace has stated he looks for. A player who was able to elevate their program to great success through their physical talent and leadership. Watson lost just two games in the past two seasons for Clemson. They reached the national championship both times and won the title recently thanks to his late-game heroics. He’s a supreme competitor who refuses to lose.

Not a bad plan

Both players look like they could have really good NFL career. The best part is they wouldn’t have to start right away in Chicago. Glennon’s arrival made that a reality. The Bears would be free to develop them steadily without taking any of the hits or suffering the disappointing mistakes. At least not until they grasp an understanding of the offensive scheme and its concepts.

Sure the common argument is a team should spend their first round pick on a player who can contribute to the team right away. A nice line for the textbooks, but it doesn’t apply to quarterbacks. That position is way too important. Chicago has mismanaged it for too long. It’s high time they took a different approach. This may not get the instant gratification typically craved, but experts need to give fans credit. They can be patient if they think the payoff in the long run is worth it.

Why the Bulls Can Push the Celtics to the Brink

It was a long and adventurous season for the No. 8 seed Chicago Bulls (41-41), but they managed to sneak into the playoffs on the very last day of the regular season by beating the Brooklyn Nets. Overall the team has been inconsistent, to say the least. Against the top teams in the NBA, the Bulls actually had an above .500 record of 12-9 and played like one of the top teams in the association. However, when faced against the bottom teams in the NBA, the Bulls struggled and often played down to their competition resulting in multiple head-scratching losses.

The Boston Celtics (53-29) come into the playoffs as the No. 1 seed in the East and have legitimate championship hopes. By and large, Isaiah Thomas has been the focal point of the Celtics offense. Throughout the regular season, he finished third in PPG with 28.9 points, trailing only MVP candidates Russell Westbrook (31.6 PPG) and James Harden ( 29.1 PPG). The Celtics have spent most of the season beating up on inferior opponents, and have struggled with teams of equal talent. If Boston hopes to finally win a playoff series it will take everything Thomas has and more.

That being said I believe this series will be a lot closer than people think. Here are five factors that I believe could tilt the series in favor of Chicago.

  1. Advantage on the Boards

Against the Celtics, the Bulls have flat out dominated the Celtics. In their four games against during the regular season, the Bulls averaged a league-best 55.4 in rebound percentage. They really shined on the offensive glass, where they averaged an impressive 15 offensive rebounds per game. In Chicago’s two wins, they outscored Boston 40-9 in second chance opportunities. If the Bulls can maintain their rebounding dominance it will go a long way in slowing down the Celtics offense.

  1. Slowing Down Isaiah Thomas

Isaiah Thomas is far and away the best player on the Celtics and one of the top offensive threats in the NBA. The Bulls will undoubtedly make Thomas the focus of their defensive game planning.

Luckily for the Bulls, they have done a pretty good job of slowing down Thomas so far this season. Against Chicago, Thomas only averaged 24.8 points which is 4.1 points less than his average. More than likely Jimmy Butler will draw Thomas as his defensive assignment, which is great news for Bulls fans. Butler is one of the perimeter defenders in the league, and if anyone can frustrate Thomas it’s Jimmy.

  1. A Healthy Dwayne Wade

On March 15th Dwayne Wade suffered a sprain and minor fracture in his elbow against the Memphis Grizzlies. It was announced he would miss the remainder of the season, and many fans were left wondering if that was the last time they would see Wade in a Bulls uniform.

Instead of being without one of their most experienced post-season players, the Bulls get Wade back with three weeks of rest. Despite getting up there in years, Wade still has plenty of veteran savvy and a career 22.8 point per game playoff average. With plenty of attention being directed towards Butler, Wade should have plenty of opportunities to light up the Celtics defense.

  1. The Pressure is on Boston

If you’re a Bulls fan the fact that they made the playoffs is in itself a victory. After an up-and-down season, there is really no pressure on a team that is the No. 8 seed in the East. If they win it’ll be nothing more than a pleasant surprise, but if they lose it’ll confirm that they are just a mediocre team that was lucky enough to make it to the playoffs.

However, if the Celtics are the team to lose, there will be much bigger ramifications for the franchise. The media and fan base will question the Celtics off-season moves, and lack of progress on acquiring a true superstar to lead the team. Coach Brad Stevens has been great for the Celtics, but if his team loses, some will question if he has what it takes to take the Celtics to the next level.

  1. The Best Player in the Series

While some may argue that Isaiah Thomas is the top player in the series, his aversion to defense is what places him as the second best player in the series. Jimmy Butler holds the title of the best player due to his equal talents on both ends of the floor.

The Celtics will do everything they can to slow down Jimmy “Buckets”, from throwing double teams to a variety of defenders his way. However, Butler has a plethora of offensive moves in his scoring arsenal. If the Celtics put a smaller player on him, he’ll have no problem backing down the defender for a quick turnaround jumper. With bigger defenders, Butler has no problem using his athleticism to quickly blow by and draw the foul, which plays right into his hands as he’s one of the better free throw shooters in the NBA.

The Bulls are no doubt the underdog of this series, but make no mistake they won’t go down without a fight. They have the veteran presence in Rondo and Wade to help right the ship when things go south. Jimmy Butler is a bonafide superstar who has more than enough talent to win a game or two on his own. If the Bulls can play disciplined basketball and execute, this series has all the makings of going six or seven games, and who knows maybe they can even pull off the upset.

How The Worst Bears Draft in a Decade Could’ve Changed Everything

There is a debate about where the true decline of the Bears began. Some think it was right after the Super Bowl in 2006. Truthfully the first real signs of slow disintegration came in 2011. Not only was that the year Jay Cutler broke his thumb and Brian Urlacher tore up his knee, both catastrophic injuries. It was also the year of the worst Bears draft in at least the past decade.

No joke. They made six selections that year, supposedly one of the most talent-rich drafts in recent memory and none of those picks are on the roster anymore.

  • 1st Round – Gabe Carimi (OT, Wisconsin)
  • 2nd Round – Stephen Paea (DT, Oregon State)
  • 3rd Round – Chris Conte (S, Cal)
  • 5th Round – Nathan Enderle (QB, Idaho)
  • 6th Round – J.T. Thomas (LB, West Virginia)

Carimi made it two games as a rookie before suffering a terrible knee injury that he never really recovered from. Paea was a decent starter at nose tackle before leaving as a free agent in 2015. Conte was an inconsistent and injury-prone player who hovered in and out of the starting lineup. Enderle never played a down in the NFL. Thomas was a special teams standout but was gone after two years.

The Worst Bears draft could’ve changed everything

That draft is what got Jerry Angelo fired and ushered in the era of Phil Emery who promptly almost one-upped him with another terrible run in 2012. Only the brief brilliance of Alshon Jeffery helped avoid that. It’s amazing to think how different things might be now had Angelo not so badly bungled that year. In fact looking back, people don’t realize how easily the Bears could’ve met all of their needs with future quality players.

Here is a re-drafting of those six picks, featuring players who were still available and taken relatively close to that position. Just try not to cry when reading it.

  • Muhammad Wilkerson (taken one pick after Carimi)
  • Rodney Hudson (taken two picks after Paea)
  • K.J. Wright (taken six picks after Conte)
  • Tyrod Taylor (taken 20 picks after Enderle)
  • Derek Newton (taken 19 picks after Thomas)

No joke. Almost every need is still met. Wilkerson would’ve made an ideal defensive tackle and interior pass rusher. He has 41 career sacks to date. Don’t forget 2011 was the year Olin Kreutz vacated the center position for the Bears, leaving a gaping hole they couldn’t fill until the arrival of Cody Whitehair five years later. Rodney Hudson, a Pro Bowler, would’ve changed that.

K.J. Wright is one of the unheralded members of the Legion of Boom defense up in Seattle. He could’ve been the heir apparent to Lance Briggs who was 31-years old at the time. Tyrod Taylor, a Pro Bowl QB in Buffalo today, would’ve made the ideal backup to Cutler. To think he was taken so far after Enderle is incredible. As for Newton, he’s had a far more productive NFL career as a tackle than Carimi and was taken in the seventh round.

What could’ve been

Sure it’s easy to have hindsight in these situations. Still it’s also fair to wonder what might’ve been for the Bears at this point had they not bungled that draft so badly. It’s quite possible Angelo might still be GM and even Lovie Smith might still be head coach. In the end it’s proof positive that the NFL draft can be a fickle beast. It will grant all your wishes one year and then shatter your dreams the next. The level of work and instinct required to succeed at it consistently is almost herculean.

A subtle reminder of just how much pressure Ryan Pace is under going into this offseasons’ main event.

Did The Blackhawks Deserve To Be Booed Off The Ice During Game 2 Meltdown?

Anybody who stepped into the United Center Saturday night hoping for a more energized, more entertaining and more competitive showing from the Chicago Blackhawks were sorely disappointed.

The Blackhawks stepped on the ice, showed an aggressive spurt for the first few minutes. But Chicago couldn’t translate a hot start into a goal and a Ryan Ellis (fluke) goal that snuck past a screened Corey Crawford (cough cough, wake up Duncan Keith, cough cough) pretty much put the UC crowd into a continued lull.

Then, embarrassment ensued. The usually poised and composed Blackhawks looked completely lost at times and flustered throughout. They went down 3-0 entering the second intermission and that brought out the boo birds from the faithful.

But should the Hawks, who have won three Stanley Cups since 2010, been booed off the ice by their own fans? Sports Mockery’s Marc-Louis Paprzyca and Matt Barbato have differing opinions.

Marc-Louis Paprzyca:  After the second period of game 2, I tweeted about Blackhawks’ fans booing in a negative manner. It received likes, retweets but some comments with differing opinions. You can read what I tweeted below and form your own opinion. Then, read my reasoning behind my tweet.

Sports get emotional for the players and the fans. Everyone is entitled to their own emotions but that doesn’t mean you need to let them be known.

For example, you love your grandma and you visit her often. Then, she gets you a terrible birthday gift. You certainly don’t boo grandma, even though you love her and put all that time and effort into her.

If that didn’t work for all the blowhards who want to tell you how much they spent on their Blackhawks playoff tickets. Here’s another one for you.

Every parent of a kid who plays sports knows how much it costs. Equipment, league fees, don’t forget gas money and time. So your kid’s team is awful. You don’t go out there and boo the kids even though you paid for it.

So I know the argument that’s coming, “These aren’t old people or kids we’re talking about.” I know. They’re professionals who have a way better sense about what is going on in their profession than you do. They have each other and countless coaches they have to look in the face.

Worst of all, we Blackhawks fans are just acting like entitled punks. We have all heard about the “Wussification of America” and this is exactly it. We have been so blessed with great Blackhawks teams of late that we can’t accept anything less than greatness. So we bitch about it. Or in this case, boo.

The United Center has been dead since the puck drop during game 1. There should be cheering and positive emotion for more than goals. The loudest sounds of the series have been boos.

Athlete’s feed on emotion. Piling on to what they know is wrong doesn’t help that. In a sense, they can be fragile like an old person or child.

Nobody is asking you to coddle them or tell them is everything is going to be ok, but a simple clap is a lot more useful. I’m not asking you to be blind to the Blackhawks’ lackluster play but stand by your team and support them. That is if you’re really behind them.

Matt Barbato: I totally hear Marc’s argument. It’s valid. The Hawks have given us plenty more to cheer about than boo or curse about the past seven years. But let’s stick to the present. When you stink, you stink and the Blackhawks played poorly not once, but twice in front of their home fans.

It’s not as if the Hawks didn’t come into the postseason with expectations, either. They were favored (along with Washington) to win the whole thing. To not only drop your first two games, but to do so in ugly fashion merits the boo birds, as crazy as that might seem.

Nashville is a very good team that should be credited with smothering the Hawks into rushed decisions and errant passes. But the Hawks made the routine impossible. They couldn’t connect on the tape-to-tape passes they’ve hit with regularity all season. They were blanked by a goaltender who’s notorious for struggling in the postseason. Heck, they barely even pressured him. Rinne barely had to sweat in either game.

I have absolutely no problem with fans booing the Hawks off the ice. That’s not to say I’m ignoring what they’ve done in the past. Bad is bad no matter the circumstances.

Insiders Reveal Chicago’s Plan To Draft Deshaun Watson

bears pick deshaun watson

Looks like the Chicago Bears pick Deshaun Watson at #3 overall is the growing belief. Not just among the national pundits and social media either. Several notable local insiders who cover the team extensively have begun to find consensus for the first time in months with the same name coming up in conversations.

It’s been felt by a great many people that the Bears needed to pick a quarterback in this draft. They have the third-highest pick available, which likely could mean they get their guy of choice. A luxury they haven’t had in over a decade. Plus with a widespread belief that four quarterbacks could go in the first round alone, that only increased the pressure to get their guy early.

Based on every scrap of info available, Watson is indeed that guy.

Bears pick Deshaun Watson may be real after all

John Mullin of CSN offered the most compelling statement yet on the subject, but he was far from alone as others joined him.

“Earlier thought was that the Bears might be looking at a safety — LSU’s Jamal Adams or Ohio State’s Malik Hooker — but the Bears have conducted some of the most exhaustive research and evaluations in recent memory not of one quarterback but multiple quarterback prospects, in particular Notre Dame’s DeShone Kizer, Texas Tech’s Pat Mahomes and Clemson’s Deshaun Watson.

And the expectation here is that Watson will be the Bears’ selection.”

Of course nothing is set in stone. There are still 11 days before the start of the draft. Minds are fickle things and can change quickly. Besides there’s no telling what will happen with the first two picks of the draft between Cleveland and San Francisco. That said almost nobody of any credible background thinks Watson will go that high.

Looking at it from a big picture perspective, of course he’d be the pick if QB was the plan. No player in this draft class better fits the mold of what Ryan Pace has repeatedly said he looks for at the position. He wants somebody who was a winner and elevated their program. Not just through their physical skills but also their charisma and leadership.

Watson went 28-2 over his final two seasons at Clemson. They reached the national championship both years and beat Alabama for the title just a few months ago in one of the greatest games ever played. Watson was magnificent in both contests. The fact he’s drawing comparisons to Marcus Mariota, somebody Pace coveted back in 2015? Just icing on the cake.

The logic in it

Look Watson isn’t perfect. Very few quarterback prospects ever are. That said there hasn’t been one more proven in terms of winning and production combined to come out of college in a long time. He’s an athlete, his arm is strong enough and he knows how to win. Aren’t these all the things that the Bears haven’t had for three decades?

Sure it may be viewed as a reach now, but if he makes even one Pro Bowl during his career in Chicago the pick becomes instantly worth it. There may be more talented players in this draft, but none who can impact football games like a quarterback can. Besides that almost every position of need from secondary to tight end, wide receiver and edge rusher is deep in this class. They can still find difference-makers later on even after they make Watson their guy.

Like it or not from a big picture standpoint, it makes a ton of sense.

Top Expert Says This Will Stop Bears From Taking 1st Round QB

bears first round quarterback
Matthew Apgar - mapgar@shawmedia.com Chicago Bears coach John Fox watches the week 1 preseason football game against the Miami Dolphins on Thursday, August 13, 2015 at Soldier Field in Chicago.

Most of the predictions are coming in now centered around the biggest buzz question. Is a Bears first round quarterback in the cards for 2017? It would mark the first time in 14 years that would happen. A number that’s hard to fathom. That means it took place in an era where Brett Favre was still quarterback in Green Bay and the big three of Eli Manning, Philip Rivers and Ben Roethlisberger weren’t even pros yet.

Some believe sleeping on the Bears is unwise in this situation, but most still think it’s not happening. John Clayton of ESPN is one of them. He did a rundown of the teams he feels most likely to take a quarterback in the 2017 draft. Then he ranked them by how high he expects them to strike. The Bears wound up fourth on the list. Not surprising, but that means they won’t draft a QB until the second or even third rounds. Clayton explained why.

Why no Bears first round quarterback

“Glennon signed a three-year, $45 million deal, but the Bears could get out of the contract after one year. Chicago can look at taking a QB to develop behind him. The Bears let Hoyer and Matt Barkley go to San Francisco in free agency and cut Jay Cutler while bringing in Mark Sanchez as the backup.

Coach John Fox knows he needs to rebuild the quarterback position, and the draft can give him one option. The Bears have the No. 3 overall pick and high picks in each round. Don’t expect a QB in the first round, but they could take one in the second, especially if the top-tier signal-callers fall out of the first round.”

Note that Clayton does not say GM Ryan Pace but instead John Fox knows. That’s interesting. After all Pace is the one calling the shots on this roster but there appears to be a perception that Fox is determining philosophy focus. In other words the consideration of taking a quarterback in the first down may hinge on whether he buys into it.

If that’s the case, then it’s fair to say Clayton is right. Chicago won’t do it.

Fox is gun shy

Why? Fox’s history as a head coach. This is a man who has held the job with three different franchises dating back 15. Across that entire span which included 11 first round picks, not a single quarterback was selected. On the flip side, they did draft one in the second round twice with Jimmy Clausen in 2010 and Brock Osweiler in 2012. Not exactly a duo that inspires confidence.

It proves that Fox has a really hard time evaluating or developing college quarterbacks with any success. His two most successful runs came with veteran free agents Jake Delhomme and Peyton Manning under center. If this is the case then why waste a top draft choice at the position, right? Take a flier on Day 2 hoping somebody really good ended up falling.

Maybe not the rosiest outlook for the Bears going into 2017, but one that is easy to see happening given their history. They have selected one QB in the top 10 total in the entirety of the Super Bowl era. It’s just not something they do. Pace seems like the only man standing in the way of that trend.

Tough to see him breaking it.

Malik Hooker vs. Jamal Adams? Easy Decision

malik hooker vs. jamal adams

Probably the biggest debate happening among Bears fans regarding the draft is whether or not to pick a safety with the #3 pick. That and if so, who it should be? The Malik Hooker vs. Jamal Adams argument is a fascinating one. Both are such talented young men who likely will have prosperous careers in the NFL when it’s all said and done. Still, the job of this front office is to pick the best player. So who is it?

A lot of people will chant for Adams but likely not because they’ve actually watched the tape. He’s just been in the public eye more often the past couple months. Hooker had surgery at the end of last season which forced him to miss the scouting combine and Ohio State pro day. So of course Adams is more preferred because he’s made the most of not going head-to-head with Hooker in drills.

The truth is that still shouldn’t be enough. Hooker is the best safety in this draft and maybe the best in at least a decade. Here’s why.

Malik Hooker vs. Jamal Adams breakdown

Measurements

  • Adams – 6’1″, 214 lbs, 9.25-inch hands
  • Hooker – 6’2″, 206 lbs, 10.75-inch hands

Experience

  • Adams – 36 games
  • Hooker – 19 games

Ball skills

  • Adams – 5 interceptions
  • Hooker – 7 interceptions

From a purely numerical standpoint, it’s easy to see why both young men are considered top draft choices. However, it’s Hooker who holds a slight edge thanks to advantages in two of the three categories listed. He is a bit taller with bigger hands than Adams and also has a much better nose for the football. Adams played almost double the amount of games Hooker did but still finished with fewer interceptions.

People can talk about Adams and his intangibles and leadership qualities all day long. That’s great. The problem is that doesn’t always make for great NFL players. There have been many outstanding leaders in this league that were relatively average-to-good performers on the field. They weren’t “special.” That is the buzzword that must come up regarding a top five pick. Is he special? Can he do things almost no other football player can?

What is special?

Hooker is the only one of the two who stands out like that. Put it this way. The difference between them is as follows. Adams is LeRoy Butler. Hooker is Ed Reed.

For those who aren’t the biggest football historians, Butler was a tremendous safety for the Green Bay Packers in the 1990s. A tough, physical and intelligent leader who went to four Pro Bowls in his career, known best for his play around the line of scrimmage. Adams is built in that exact same style and mentality.

Ed Reed? He may go down in history as the greatest pure free safety of the Super Bowl era. A true ball hawk who snagged a ridiculous 72 interceptions in his career for the Baltimore Ravens. His mixture of size and range made him a feared presence on the field. It didn’t matter if he was hurt, he’d still make things happen. Hooker showed he was that kind of player at Ohio State, even after just one season.

That may be an unfair comparison but it’s reality nonetheless. Hooker is a unique and ultra-rare talent at the safety position. He represents a level of skill the Bears haven’t had there in a decade, maybe ever. We know he’ll take the football away. We know he’ll play through pain and know he can produce in big games. The fact he’s this good having started the game just four years ago and is only 21-years old?

The possibilities could be limitless, both for him and the Bears defense if Ryan Pace were to pull the trigger.

Kris Bryant Just Hit A 451-Foot HR Off The Video Board

Moonshots, that’s what Kris Bryant does best and boy did he give Chicago Cubs fans a treat on Saturday. In the first inning, Bryant blasted a 451-foot home run off the video board in left field for his first homer of 2017.

The reigning National League MVP crushed this ball.

Wind is blowing out at more than 20 mph at Wrigley Field, but this ball was going out no matter what.

Expect more dingers today.