For some reason there are more than a few Chicago Cubs fans upset about the deal Yu Darvish received. The four-time MLB all-star has reportedly agreed to a six-year deal worth a guaranteed $126 million. The contract could be worth up to $150 million with incentives.

Darvish, 31, was projected to get at least $160 million, but after a stalemate between free agents and teams this offseason, Theo Epstein gave in with the extra years on the contract, while at the same time acquiring the No. 1 free agent starter for an average of $21 million a season. Yeah, $21 million is A LOT of money for you and I, but for the best free agent pitcher on the market? A steal for the Cubs.

Before we get into the bigger contract comparisons, the Cubs just had John Lackey on a two-year deal that payed him $32 million, $16 million a year. So, $5 million more on average for Darvish? I’ll take it.

Now, let’s take a look at how Darvish’s contract matches up with the biggest deals given to starting pitchers in recent years.

The first chart will list the nine biggest starting pitching contracts, as well as the average annual value, the length of the contract, age at the time of the first year of the deal and then accumulated fWAR in the five years leading up to the deal.

(spotrac)

The following chart will include Yu Darvish, along with contracts that are most similar to his deal with the Cubs.

(spotrac)

Just look at the two pitchers above Darvish. Jordan Zimmermann and Johnny Cueto got the third and fourth biggest deals that offseason, behind Price and Greinke. The third and fourth biggest contracts only two years ago are still going to be more than this offseason’s biggest contract for a starting pitcher, Yu Darvish.

OK, let’s make the easy comparison. Jon Lester vs. Yu Darvish. Both pitching in year one of their contracts at age 31, while also agreeing to the same six years and having almost identical value in the previous five seasons, (19.1 fWAR, 19 fWAR). A couple different factors played into the signings. First, when the Cubs signed Lester, they needed to make a big move. The front office new the team was on the cusp and needed that one huge acquisition to get them to the next level. Also, Lester didn’t have any health concerns that Darvish has, so that’s why he got that extra guaranteed money.

All that being said, Darvish signed three years later and has maintained his success even after Tommy John surgery. Contracts are supposed increase. I guess the Cubs were lucky that all of a sudden teams were more cautious about spending, but still Darvish was projected to get $160 million guaranteed. The Cubs managed to sign Darvish for only $4 million more per year than Lester with the same goal. As long as the Cubs remain World Series contenders, the Darvish contract is worth it. No one is going to care what he’s making in the last few years of his contract just like we’re not going to care that Lester will make $25 million a season in the last few years of his contract.

If you look at the biggest contract, Zack Greinke, notice that he signed at 32, while compiling a 22.4 fWAR in the five seasons prior to signing. So, he was 0.68 fWAR better than Darvish a year during that five-year period, but he got $13 million more per year on his deal being one year older than Darvish at the time of the contract signing.

Of course there could be a downside to giving big contracts to pitchers who are in their 30s. Not every team is going to be able to max out their stars at a young age. Out of the 13 biggest contracts listed, seven were given before the pitcher was 30-years-old and only Masahiro Tanaka, Stephen Strausburg, Felix Hernandez and Clayton Kershaw were younger than 29.

So, the pitchers who were at least 29-years-old when getting the bags of money are Greinke, David Price, Max Scherzer, Justin Verlander, Lester, Cole Hamels, Jordan Zimmermann and Johnny Cueto. All of those pitchers are making more money per year on average than Darvish.

Yes, Scherzer is insane, Verlander was a machine in the second half last year, while Hamels and Lester have stayed consistent, but you can’t make the argument that the Cubs overpaid for Yu Darvish. That is simply false. The Cubs paid accordingly to what previous contracts have been and to some extent, looking at Lester’s deal, you can even say they got a bargain with Darvish.

More importantly, the Cubs stayed aggressive and signed the best man available. At the end of the day, who cares how much Yu Darvish is making. He makes the Cubs better and gives them a better chance to avoid being a Wild Card and once in the playoffs he gives the Cubs a better chance to win a World Series. I don’t care about what he did against the Houston Astros. He was tipping his pitches and that’s going to be fixed.

Fine, I get that you could be mad about not having Jake Arrieta back. He was a monster with the Cubs, having one of the most dominant runs this franchise has ever seen. His 2015 season may never be matched by another Cubs pitcher again. But, big but here, if Theo Epstein and the rest of the front office were on Yu Darvish and not Arrieta, I’ll go with their judgement on this signing. And again, the signing in a vacuum is a fucking steal for the Cubs.

Now get out of my face bitching about Yu Darvish making $21 million a year and get back to bitching about Jose Quintana, who might be the best pitcher on the team, while making peanuts, but some of you are just too dumb to realize how good he is.

Recent reports indicated that the Chicago Cubs and Jake Arrieta barely had any contact during the offseason and any contract talk was nonexistent. However, according to Jon Heyman, the Cubs apparently made a big offer to Arrieta, who turned it down.

The Cubs signed Yu Darvish to a six-year, $126 million contract, with an opt-out after the second year and incentives that could make the deal worth $150 million. A similar deal was proposed to Arrieta, who said no, according to Heyman.

Via Heyman of FanRag Sports.

The Chicago Cubs were down the road with Yu Darvish, but before they completed a deal, Cubs baseball president Theo Epstein, respectfully, put in one last call to the Cubs’ star free agent Jake Arrieta for one last, long-shot chance to see if — if need be — they could extend Arrieta’s career with a deal believed to be similar to the one offered to Darvish should Darvish turn them down.

Darvish was the focus by that point, but with some uncertainty about whether he’d take the deal, Epstein made the call to Arrieta to see where he stood. And to no one’s surprise, while Arrieta surely appreciated the gesture, he wasn’t immediately prepared to accept a six-year deal for what was believed to be for a similar annual salary, which was important for the Cubs, who are intent on staying under the $197 million threshold that has become an impediment in the free-agent market.

Remember, Arrieta has pitched less than Darvish and has put up better numbers in the past few years, obviously helped by that insane 2015 season, but turning down a six-year deal? I know he’s a Scott Boras client and ever since 2015, the agent has been talking about trying to get Arrieta a Max Scherzer-type contract, but boy does this seem a little odd.

If you go back to November, initial projections for Arrieta had him at about four or five years and $25 million on average. At no point did anyone expect to see Arrieta get more than Darvish, so it’s quite interesting to see that he would turn down a six-year contract, especially because we’re basically at the start of spring training.

The other thing is, nothing has been reported before about the Cubs having serious discussions with Arrieta this offseason and suddenly Theo Epstein offers him six years? As a matter of fact, last week there were two reports (USA TODAY, FanGraphs) that the Cubs hadn’t really spoken with Arrieta.

So, could this new report be some kind of favor from the Cubs to Arrieta because the assumption is that something must be wrong with the pitcher if the organization that he’s been with for the past 4.5 years didn’t appear at all interested in bringing him back?

This feels more like the Cubs trying to help Jake out against a possible "If the Cubs didn't want him back something must be wrong with him" narrative than anything else

— Jay Rigdon (@jayrigdon5) February 12, 2018

But let’s say it is true, Arrieta has to be pretty confident that he’s going to get a better deal from someone else, right? Unless he simply didn’t want to come back? That’s all speculation though. From what we know, Arrieta did say publicly that he wanted to remain with the Cubs, but it appears as though their offer wasn’t good enough.

But again, it doesn’t seem like this Cubs office to all of a sudden make an offer after four months of nothing. There is definitely more to this story.

So, how do fans feel about this, again assuming it’s true? (I’m not buying it) Scott Boras totally made this up, right?