Thursday, April 25, 2024

Ryan Poles Finally Shared Why He Traded Justin Fields

-

Justin Fields spent three years as the Chicago Bears’ starting quarterback. A lot of that time was rough, but there were flashes of brilliance, too. He seemed to show some real progress down the stretch of last season. However, many wondered if it was enough to convince GM Ryan Poles to pass on a young quarterback with the #1 overall pick for the second straight year. It was not. After extended evaluations of the incoming draft class and a feeling out of the market, Chicago finally shipped Fields out to the Pittsburgh Steelers for a conditional pick in 2025.

Poles stood before the media down in Orlando, Florida, for the annual Owners Meetings. There, he was inevitably asked about how things unfolded. He and head coach Matt Eberflus informed Fields together once the deal was made, calling it one of the hardest decisions he’s had to make. Poles also noted the primary driving force was the contract situation.

He went on to elaborate further.

Many people believed Fields had done enough over the past year to justify a Day 2 pick in the draft. So for him to go for a future 6th was disappointing. Poles also admitted he hadn’t expected the market to unfold like that.

“I was a little bit surprised,” Poles said at the NFL league meeting Monday. “But as you do research and we have conversations, you have to kind of adjust to the market. But I think just with how other teams are built, because if you look at the beginning, there are probably teams that are looking at the draft for guys to fill in. On the back end, playoff teams probably have someone in place. So really it was a smaller pool of teams.”

Poles said he wanted to do right by Justin if a trade did happen. Why Pittsburgh? It came down to the other possible destinations having tougher paths to playing time. While Russell Wilson is hardly an easy obstacle, his smaller contract should make the Steelers more open to giving Fields a legitimate opportunity.

Subscribe to the BFR podcast and ride shotgun with Dave and Ficky as they break down Bears football like nobody else.

“They have a starter with Russ but there was more of an open competition, it felt like from my perspective, where there were other opportunities where there were some quarterbacks that were either veteran guys or young guys that had already been paid, so it would have been a tougher situation for him to get on the field,” Poles said.

Credit to Ryan Poles for being honest with Fields from the start.

He was in constant communication with the quarterback throughout the process. Reports indicate Fields expressed his opinion on possible destinations, including ones he didn’t want to go to. Poles took those comments and did his best to adhere to his wishes, even when he was under no obligation to. The Bears may not have gotten the compensation they wanted, but they did right by a player who did everything in his power to become a success for this franchise. It simply didn’t work out.

Don’t be surprised if this trade ends up becoming a win-win for both sides. Fields goes to an organization known for its stability. They understand how to build around quarterbacks. If any team can rescue him, it would be Pittsburgh. Conversely, Ryan Poles has done a terrific job rebuilding the offense with talent at every position. No Bears GM has set the table better for a young quarterback in franchise history. If Caleb Williams is the guy, his chances for success are higher than any previous 1st round pick before him.

28 COMMENTS

Notify of
28 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
PoochPest
PoochPest
Mar 27, 2024 8:31 am

@Arnie @Tred @David @barry_mccockiner I agree with all the variants of how you see the situation. Ryan Poles probably is as truthful as he can be, and trading Fields to Pittsburgh was both an admission of his (Poles) missteps in building the Bears up, and treating Fields decently for putting up with the BS. Over and over I hear writers and podcasters and bloggers (and “influencers,” I mean “insiders”) yap about how Fields can’t pass, and while being an elite athlete, isn’t even a “good” passer. Consider the accumulation of evidence stemming from Poles first days: 1) He agreed to… Read more »

Ralph Law
Ralph Law
Mar 26, 2024 3:37 pm

Poles traded Fields to make himself relevant in the long range Bears plans. While busy failing the Bears thus far in his third season, “King Poles” now has to make things click – meaning winning more games than losing – as they start his third season at 10-24. Poles needs to win a minimum of 12 games this season simply to match with Ryan Pace accomplished during his third season in 2018, and that was with Mitch at QB. For all of the Bears moves which included signing two all pros to WR and RB, hiring of actual professional NFL… Read more »

Wes P
Wes P
Mar 26, 2024 3:28 pm

Ryan Poles continues to demonstrate that he will do whatever is necessary to improve the Bears football organization but he also has a heart for players being treated with respect and integrity.

barry_mccockiner
Mar 26, 2024 9:30 am

Why do you think Poles dealt Fields for practically nothing? As in: Why not hang onto him even if the plan is to pick Caleb at 1.01? Fields will earn something like $5M this year, and the league permits an emergency QB to be rostered without counting against the roster limit.

I don’t see the logic in just giving him away for nothing unless the reason is to make it so Caleb doesn’t have to compete with anyone for QB1.

nonobaddog
nonobaddog
Mar 26, 2024 8:05 am

Doesn’t matter what Poles said, if Williams or whoever replaces Fields ever has a bad game, throws for less than 300 yards in a game, throws an interception or misses seeing an “open” receiver, you can bet there will be a bunch of people complaining about it. There will also be people pushing to “reset the clock” after 3 years no matter how the new qb plays. Especially after building an actual offense and getting better coaches for the offense

Chicago SportsNEWS
Recommended for you

28
0
Give us your thoughts.x
()
x