Thursday, November 16, 2023

Chicago Bears Face A Significant Roadblock To A New Stadium


When the Chicago Bears put in their bid of $197.2 million for the Arlington Park racecourse property, it was the biggest indication in years that they were determined to leave Soldier Field. The organization had grown tired of the constant battling with the Chicago Park District over renovations to the stadium, now one of the most outdated in the NFL. They were basically ignored when they attempted to install a sportsbook to accommodate legalized gambling. Two weeks later, the bid was placed.

Now it appears the organization is mere months away from closing the deal, giving them control of a property that spreads across 326 acres. That is more than enough to construct a new stadium. Mayor Lori Lightfoot and other Chicago politicians’ attempts to convince and/or intimidate them into reconsidering has failed. That doesn’t mean they’re entirely toothless, though. According to several sources, one problem continues to stare down the McCaskey family.


As rich as they are, they aren’t exceedingly wealthy compared to other owners in the NFL. Stadiums are expensive. Recent ones have cost anywhere from $2-5 billion. Most owners aren’t capable of paying for that entirely on their own. They need help from the state through public funding. A lot of it, according to a recent study.

🔥 Check Out The BFR Podcast: Listen Now🎙

“Reviewing the financing for the 21 new NFL stadiums since 1998, the Buffalo News found public financing commonly was 60% or more. It was 100% in Tampa, Florida.”

Chicago Bears may have trouble getting what they need.

It’s been made clear already by several government officials that the Bears shouldn’t expect any financial support from the state. That is a problem. Reports say the team has brought in architects who helped build the brand new Allegiant Stadium in Las Vegas. That cost $1.9 billion to build. If that holds true for the Bears’ new building, 60% comes to $1.14 billion. No wonder the state is already saying they won’t do it.

That is where the city comes back into play. If they have one ace up their sleeve, it’s an ability to mitigate the need for public money, as David Roeder pointed out in the Chicago Sun-Times.

“Mayor Lori Lightfoot, however, has factors in her favor for keeping the Bears. As you read details of stadium subsidies, you get repeated references to bond issues and taxes on retail sales, hotel stays and car rentals, all ready-made Chicago revenue sources Arlington Heights cannot match. The city has better odds of drafting a package for the Bears that doesn’t require state money.”

This comes down to how many investors the Chicago Bears can find willing to help with the property in Arlington Heights. They’ll have to construct it in a way that is great for fans and generating revenue. If they struggle to do this, it might bring them back to the bargaining table with the city. The odds don’t favor it. There should be no shortage of business entities eager to partner with a top NFL franchise with one of the largest fanbases in football.


Notify of
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ryan Ryan
Ryan Ryan
Jun 22, 2022 3:17 pm

It’s a State decision.. NOT CHICAGO.. with revenue Of the hotels and sorts book Prickster would bend over backwards to help fund it.. not launder it through Chicago and receive Pennie’s on the dollar.z

Teofilo C Duran Jr
Teofilo C Duran Jr
Jun 21, 2022 4:00 pm

The BEARS they need defense,offense to be better and protect the QB

Jun 21, 2022 9:37 am

The City of Chicago paid for remodeled Soldier Field based on the specs the Bears wanted . Comments about the Stadiums seating capacity are ironic . The Bears signed off on a downsized venue that looks like a spaceship that landed on the collums . THe Park District is not a bad lanlord , the Bears are an ungrateful , phony tennant.

Bronco Grabowski
Bronco Grabowski
Jun 20, 2022 3:19 pm

What the McCaskeys can obtain in Arlington Heights, however, is the ability to bring in investors to help develop the PROPERTY, while still retaining controlling ownership of the team itself. The Ricketts gobbled up land around Wrigley themselves, but with undeveloped (or redeveloped) land, there are plenty of other option. The Bears can effectively maintain ownership of the land, while parceling out rights to build buildings on the land, up to and including the stadium itself. Think of it like enhanced naming rights, only there’s a direct revenue stream attached once the property starts making money. It’s fully possible to… Read more »

Jun 20, 2022 3:01 pm

It’s easier for me to get in/and out of Arlington Heights than it is to Soldier Field. And I live in the City!

Chicago SportsNEWS
Recommended for you

Give us your thoughts.x